Strategic decision making is a part of almost any job, but it’s all-encompassing when it comes to project management. PMs are not only faced with making strategic decisions to deliver a project successfully, they are also well-positioned to help stakeholders make decisions that will impact their projects.
One set of decisions plays into the other, and PMs hope they all work together. It’s widely known and mostly accepted that there’s a general lack of control in the PM role, but an area that any project manager can control is in charting and managing a project strategy that will guide projects through change, issues, and even progress. And that’s where stress comes in!
In this episode of Time Limit, Brett sits down with Yoon Chung
from Veritas to discuss the project manager’s role in decision
making, and doing so in stressful situations. The conversation
covers:
With a career spanning 20+ years, Yoon has worked in companies such as Sun Microsystems, PayPal, Rosetta Stone, Visa, Symphony and Veritas, doing the full gamut of project, program and agile software management.
His background in project/program management and behavioral development has made him a valued advisor to many leaders at his companies. His leadership has often acted as a multiplier effect in company transformations and was part of the executive team that led the start-up Symphony Communication to unicorn status.
As an experienced coach and mentor for leaders in organizations,
Yoon consults in up-leveling individuals and teams using methods
in design thinking, Lean principles, and Agile methodologies to
bring out the best in organizations. He is a master storyteller,
certified Gallup StrengthsFinder Coach, a certified MBTI
Practitioner, LUMA Certified Practitioner and an accomplished
speaker and researcher in the areas of communication, influence
and leadership. Yoon currently leads Program Management for the
Product Management and User Experience Organization at Veritas
Technologies.
Brett Harned: Hey, welcome
to Time Limit. This is your host, Brett Harned, and I'm glad
that you're playing this episode. Because the topic I think
will likely push the boundaries of what some people consider to be
project management. So we're going to talk all about project
management as a strategic role and how that, the idea of embracing
strategy, can impact the role itself, your team, your projects, and
even your stakeholders.
Now, I'm
not claiming this to be some kind of mind blowing concept. And
we'll definitely get into some other related topics around
decision making and taking on project stress as a PM. But I was
really excited to find out just how aligned I was with my guest,
Yoon Chung, on the idea of PM as a strategic role. So Yoon leads
program management for the product management and user experience
organization at Veritas Technologies.
He's also
presenting strategic decision making in stressful situations at the
Digital PM Summit 2020, which just so happens to be the conference
that I organized. And it's happening online this October 19th
through the 21st. So whether you'll be attending the Digital PM
Summit and Yoon session or not, I think this topic is a good one to
think on. And I hope you enjoy the conversation. Yoon, thank you so
much for joining me on Time Limit. How are you doing today?
Yoon
Chung: I am doing great.
First off, thank you for having me. It's both an honor and a
privilege because the topics that we're going to be talking
about here as well as in the Digital PM Summit coming up later on
the year are very near and dear to my heart. So thank you for having
me and giving me this opportunity. I feel very privileged. So thank
you.
Brett Harned:
Thank you. I feel privileged to have you here. And I'm
really excited to dig in on the topic. So everyone's thinking,
all right, what is the topic? So you are going to be speaking at the
2020 Digital PM Summit and it's about strategic decision
making. I think we could probably take the conversation down a
couple of paths, because I think your topic actually kind of gets a
little bit more into personality and stressful situations. But I
thought maybe we could start at the top really and just talk about
strategic decisions in project management. I'm curious, do you
see project managers as strategic decision makes?
Yoon
Chung: Oh, this is one of
my favorite, favorite topics.
Brett Harned:
Awesome. Me too.
Yoon Chung:
So I'm super excited.
Let me just state this right here right now. Project managers serve
as the... They must have incredible tenet strength, but they are
probably one of the most key influencers for strategy. And they can
either make or break any projects. And as the saying goes in the
world of PMs, you're only as good as the last project you
deliver.
So being able
to be strategic is incredibly important. So in regards to your
question, let me just give my definition of why PM's strategy
as well as the art of decision making is so critical. Because
strategy, as there are many classical definitions, I like the
Harvard Business Review definition they give. There was an article a
couple of years ago about strategy is really setting some guiding
principles that when communicated and adopted really help generate a
desired pattern for decision making.
So once you
have that set of patterns for making effective decisions, it is
probably one of the most powerful assets that a PM can have within
their arsenal to be strategic. And there are many ways to be
strategic, but being a wise decision maker or influencing the
decision makers is why it is an art based on science. And so
that's kind of my definition, what I'll be talking about
in the coming summit.
But even just
here, just giving a couple of tips in terms of why is it that
it's so critical for a PM to be strategic. I would say at the
highest level, a PM serves as the bootcamp and the school of hard
knocks for all future leaders. Because no matter how good a leader
is from a strategic standpoint, being able to bridge the gap between
strategy and execution, this is where we are most strong. This is
what makes us unique.
And
that's why I think project managers going into the next
generation, going into 2020 and above, this is where we need to
thrive as a discipline. I know I'm going way over on just one
question, but I'm super passionate about this topic and
something that I really think that we all need to embrace within the
PM community.
Brett Harned:
Yeah. So I'm sitting here nodding so hard that
I'm like rocking back and forth in my chair because... As
someone who is a seasoned project manager, do you feel that there is
very little expectation for PMs to be strategic or even an
expectation that PM's are just kind of like the box checkers.
You set up a plan, you help get things don.
I've seen
organizations where a PM is handled that way and it's mind
blowing because they're missing out on this really critical
aspect to the role that can help to get projects done with better
quality and better outcomes, like meeting goals so much better
because there's someone there thinking strategically, not just
how to get the project done, but like why it's being done, like
thinking back to those goals. I don't know. A lot of what you
said, I just feel like I would love it if more project managers
would push the fact that they are strategic in their roles and in a
lot of different ways, kind of like what you said.
Yoon
Chung: You bring up two
really great, great points, but let me get to the first one because
I would say we face this on a regular basis. Project managers, one,
I think from a discipline standpoint, we've become our own
worst enemy, in many regards. There are so many different
methodologies and so many tools that we use that we forget what are
the basic tenets of what makes for a great project manager.
And
there's a level of connectivity we need to have going from
person A to person B. And there's an emotional intelligence
that is just needed. I would say within Silicon Valley here, there
is a bias towards making sure that PMs tend to have more subject
matter expertise in a discipline, whether it's engineering,
product management or design.
Because I
think older generational learning, I'm not being agist, but in
terms of just learning has always been let's use this
methodology. And that's why I like to say it's an art
based on science. I mean, one of the ways that I would recommend,
what is one thing you can do to become a more strategic PM so that
people take you seriously and not just call a meeting, take some
notes, follow up on the action items.
I'm an
introvert by nature and one of the best advices I've ever been
given is ask good questions. And then I asked my mentor, "I may
ask a dumb question. Is there such a thing as a dumb question?"
And he said, "As a PM, absolutely." Because if you ask a
dumb question, and truly I'd say a numbskull, like if somebody
asks you what is the timeline or when are things due and you
don't know, and it's your own project, you're going
to lose respect.
Here are just
two tips I give everyone as we go through this great conversation.
Master the art of why and how. And the reason I say this is asking
why, whether it's the five why's or using that in
combination with Ishikawa fishbone diagramming, asking why questions
will lead to strategic answers. And having those strategic answers
will give you context as well as challenges of the other person,
whether it's your stakeholder or a leader, to explain the why,
because everyone needs to know the why.
As a
discipline, we tend to focus on the how. The how is usually the
tactical steps, which usually evolve down to allocation of time,
resources and money. If you can learn how to ask at least one why
and how question anytime somebody asks you to do something,
supremely powerful. And it's a great ice breaker for even the
introverts who might be a little bit more shy to be more engaged
because often this will lead to strategic discussion and debate
which people might not have.
And people
will see PMs as either primary strategic thinkers or influencers of
strategic decision. Simon Sinek always says start with why. But
start with why, start with how, influence the decision, step one to
being a very good strategic PM within your field.
Brett
Harned: Yeah, absolutely. I
mean, I talk about that all the time, just asking questions. Never
feel like there is a dumb question. Now, of course, there are
certainly some kind of numbskull questions, like you mentioned. But
when it comes to figuring out what your project is, what it's
meant to do, what the goals are and how your team can meet those
goals.
And then
learning about the factors that can impact your projects, typically
the people, like asking the right questions of them and their
expertise in subject matter and even just how they like to
communicate, how they expect to work on the project. Those things
are all going to impact your project, but they're certainly
going to impact the strategy of how you get that project done or how
you end up motivating those people at the end of the day.
So I think
what we're talking about a lot is high level kind of strategic
thinking in terms of project management, is that it's not just
about following a methodology or putting together a plan and
following it, it's about digging in and understanding what
you're doing, how you're doing it and why you're
doing it.
On the project
level, what do you think are the kind of strategic decisions that
PM's are making? I know we talked a little bit about how a lot
of it is facilitation, facilitating decisions. In my experience, I
know that I have facilitated a lot of decisions that led teams or
stakeholders to make important decisions. On the kind of PM level,
what kind of strategic decisions do you think they're
making?
Yoon Chung:
Let's go with some of the classical definitions you might
see. Time, scope, quality, depending on your field. Here is how I
would gauge it as... If you were to reflect back as a PM in your
field, what level of those facets do you have influence over? And
I'll use the example, how much influence do you have as a PM in
prioritization? Is it at the tactical level?
If we're
doing software development, in terms of some of the tasks. From a
marketing perspective, are you able to prioritize and help your
stakeholders in terms of why we're doing certain things and
how? And a lot of that comes from... Some of it is subject matter
expertise in terms of how you get things done with the people you
know. Other times it's, do you have credibility?
There's a
certain level of pedigree that a PM should have, depending on the
project. But in terms of facilitating strategic decisions, once
again, based on science, I would recommend and tell every PM who is
in that situation, if you want to be able to facilitate and be part
of the discussion, they say be on the dance floor and on the dance
floor. Tip number two, never ask for status.
Just remove
the word status from anytime you're talking to your teammates,
because there's a psychological bias that we are check the
boxers and status usually associates with that. Just go, "Cool.
What's the latest? What do I need to know? What does the team
need to know?" If you just open it up with that open statement,
it leads very easily into why and how questions. And it can also
open up for just decisions.
Next time
you're going into a meeting and you're asked and
they're looking to make a decision or being part of decision
making, just asking, "Give me two minutes of context. Give me
the cliff notes version." And start probing with those
questions. And it helps out tremendously in terms of building that
respect and pedigree of our discipline.
Brett Harned:
Totally agree. You know what
I call that? I call that the human approach.
Yoon Chung:
Absolutely.
Brett
Harned: So many people
treat PMs like robots because they ask robotic questions, right? If
you ask me a status, it feels like something I could type into an
email or a chat or whatever. If you ask me how I'm feeling, how
I'm doing, that leads to a conversation that allows you to get
to know me better, which allows me to understand your motivations,
understand your challenges and at the end of the day help you. And
if a PM can think and behave that way, they're going to build
so much better relationships and build trust and really enable teams
and team members to get things done.
Yoon Chung:
You're actually giving me
goosebumps because quite literally, I'm going to be talking
about this later in the year. But this is something that I think
all... This is tip number three, but this is a big one. In terms of
how do you handle these situations where you're working on
projects and there's a lot of decisions or just in general
interactions, psychologists Goleman and Ekman talk about empathy
when it comes to thinking.
And
there's kind of a three-step process that they go through from
a psychology standpoint, from a pure discipline standpoint. But this
is something I think all PMs, leaders in general, I'd say
professionals, influencers should take to heart of the human
element. And that is empathy based thinking. There's a lot of
design thinking around this, whether it's IDEO or double
diamond methodologies.
But the three
things that if you take empathy as an approach. Let's say, step
one, cognitive empathy. It's the ability to understand how a
person feels and what they may be thinking. It makes us be better
communicators in the best way possible and authentic way. Marrying
that with emotional empathy, the ability to share the feelings,
creating that emotional connection.
If you usually
have those two at least, it will usually lead towards a compassion
based empathy, which is not empathy, or I should say sympathy, but
it's beyond just the understanding and the sharing, the
feeling. It leads to action. And if you do that in just
microseconds, just cognitive, emotional, what is my action? Which is
why... If it's just asking, "How's your day been
going? What'd you got for me? You got some good news?"
"We're behind schedule." "Really? Why?"
We've just created a connection and that's even more
powerful than asking what's your status, which does nothing for
a person nor acknowledges them as a human being. I'm so with
you on so many levels right now.
Brett Harned:
Awesome. I want to kind of put all of
this in the context of it certainly being a challenge, right? Like
you and I can certainly sit here based on the experience we have,
based on observing other PM's and just like knowing how some
folks in the team feel about PM's. And it's not all rosy,
right? There are times where it's not great at all.
And I think
part of what we have to do is build PMs up and recognize that it can
be a challenge when you are in a stressful project and you really
need to get a decision made to move on, whether that could be on the
design of a thing, whatever the decision might be. To me, it feels
like a big challenge. And you might not agree with me on this.
A big part of
the challenge in PMs feeling like they can facilitate a decision or
they can just take their reins and make a decision for the sake of
the project or the team or the scope, whatever it might be,
it's a communication barrier. And we're kind of like
talking about that already. I'm wondering if you have kind of
any tactics that you use when it comes to level setting a
conversation or even just like resetting expectations to facilitate
a conversation that will then lead to a decision. Any tactics in
that realm to help teams or even stakeholders make decisions?
Yoon
Chung: There are so many
different ways. Going back to starting with why... And usually if
there is that type of level of conversation that happens in terms of
whether there's conflict or there's butting of heads or
even just, "Do I take my PM even seriously?" Asking why is
literally one of my favorite things to do just in general. And I
think people take that as an offense or you're questioning
their identity. But it's not. Why aren't we doing this or
can you tell me why you think your approach works better than this
other cross-functional stakeholder?
Getting
context and understanding the problem is probably one of the first
things I would recommend all the PMs when they run into any type of
situation, even at beginning of the project. Albert Einstein was
once asked this question of, if you're given an hour to solve a
problem, how would you use that time? And to paraphrase, I believe
he said, "I would spend 55 minutes thinking of the problem and
five minutes with the solution." And I think most of us as PMs,
I think we kind of inherently know what the best solution might
be.
But building
alignment around the problem itself just through open dialogue is
one of the hardest but also one of the most rewarding things.
Because any PM can manage an easy project. It takes true talent and
skill to manage a hard one when it comes to especially building
alignment and common understanding around a problem statement. I
encourage heavy debate and honest candour when it comes to that
early stage of even team dynamics, form, storm, norm, perform.
And storm
period is actually one of my favorite phases because you learn so
much about yourself as well as the team. So start with the why and
figure out what the problem is. And if you get stuck, well, ask your
PM community for help.
Brett Harned:
Totally. Those are out here.
Yoon
Chung: Ask for help.
We're all here.
Brett Harned:
Yeah, it's true. I'm with you on that,
too. And I think it's not only asking why, it's also being
conscious about the way that you're asking why because you kind
of alluded to the fact that it could come off not in the best way.
It could make people lose trust in you because they just think you
don't know what you're talking about, or it could make
people think that you're constantly playing the devil's
advocate role and nobody loves that, right?
So for someone
who is newer to PM, for someone who's working with a new team
that might be full of subject matter experts like people who really
just know their stuff, you can put yourself in a bit of a pressure
cooker as a PM if you're not feeling like you really know
everything. And it can be hard to ask why. But I think if
you're genuine about it, you're going to get good
results.
I also think
that as PMs, we tend to be under pressure a lot, right? Because you
want things to go well. You're responsible for being within a
budget, delivering on time, making sure your team is headed in the
right direction, making progress. Individually they feel like
they're working toward goals. As a team they're working
towards... There's a lot, right? And I think that alone can
bring a lot of stress to PMs.
So as a
seasoned PM, I'm sure that you've encountered a lot of
that on your own. I know I certainly have. You've been managing
PM's who you've had to help through it. What are the
things that you think contribute to that stress? The reason I ask
this question is because I think it's important for a PM to
recognize what stress comes along with their day to day, regardless,
so that they can kind of compartmentalize when needed.
Yoon
Chung: Oh, another topic
that's great. I'm going to give a super simple, I would
say oversimplified answer in terms of just the first step when it
comes to stress. And as project leaders, we face it all the time,
but how do we manage it? How do we make sure that we're not, as
I would call, being an energy vampire and sucking away the energy
from your team or just being that toxic person?
I forgot the
study, but there's a study that shows that in a group of 10, it
only takes one toxic person to produce overall efficiency by almost
a third, in terms of just both quantitative and qualitative drain.
HR, managing, managing conflicts. But when dealing with stress and
these really strong, stressful situations, the first question I ask
myself and ask everyone else, did you eat? Did you have some coffee?
Are you tired? Did you sleep?
And it sounds
so easy, but I think we forget to ask because it is our first
biological need and not having just those prerequisites will
influence you. It will make you irritable. But if we were to take
more of a scientific approach, back in early 2010s, 2011, there was
a study around what they call the irrational hungry judge effect. So
there was a study around Israeli parole boards in situations where
ruling was favorable towards one person versus another.
And they said
that there was a higher chance of having a ruling in your favor if
you started earlier in the day versus later in the day, because the
theory goes that you're just mentally depleted. You're
just tired. Your cognitive brain battery just runs out. And usually
it recharges after lunch. Now, there was a recent study back in 2016
that says the data is not a hundred percent perfect.
But I think
from a guiding principle standpoint, where we get the term hangry,
when you're hungry and angry, always ask yourself just that one
first most basic question. Am I hungry, tired or thirsty? If even
one of those is not checked, you might be a little bit more
irritable. It could lead to a little bit more stress. And it is
reflected. So if you want to manage the stress, feed your team, feed
yourself, have a cup of coffee, and you'd be surprised how just
that takes edge off for the team. And going back to our earlier
point of the human approach to project management, it is the first
basic thing.
When you eat
together, you're building a community together and you're
establishing some level of trust because most people will eat, but
you eat with the people you like, I hope, or eat by yourself because
you like yourself. So I'd say start with food and drink first.
You'd be surprised how much of an edge it takes off when it
comes to these situations.
Brett Harned:
Like get your brain in shape, right?
Yoon
Chung: Absolutely.
Brett Harned:
Set yourself up for success. That absolutely makes sense. And make
sure your team's there as well.
Yoon Chung:
Yeah. It's so simple, but we
don't do it. And it's scary how something as simple as
just making sure you are just taking care of yourself. It's one
of the first things they teach in executive coaching and executive
leadership programs is diet and exercise. Are you taking care of
yourself? So please, everyone who's listening to this, eat some
decent food, get a cup of coffee and make sure you're getting
some decent sleep. And trust me, it will help in terms of managing
these stressful situations and manage them properly. I can't
say it enough.
Brett Harned:
It's true though. I've experienced it myself,
especially on the sleep part. It's like, if you're not
getting good rest, then you're not going to be the top of your
game. And when you're talking about stressful situations that
aren't necessarily all just reliant on your own mood or your
own kind of well-being, sometimes it's related to the team or a
decision that a stakeholder needs to make that you have to help
with.
But I want to
talk a little bit about the psychology of stressful situations,
because I think that's going to be a part of your session at
the Digital PM Summit. I think a little bit about its impact on
making strategic decisions. Can we get a little sneak peek of kind
of what you're going to be talking about there?
Yoon
Chung: Sure. I have to
give a lot of credit towards a professor Linda Ginzel at Chicago
Booth's program, as well as folks at Stanford as well. He
really inspired a lot of this from a project management standpoint
in terms of how do we manage stress in these strong social
situations to making sure that we are building that level of trust
with our stakeholders, but people are seeing this as these strategic
thought leaders within our teams? And I alluded to one point in
terms of food and diet.
But one of the
things I'll be talking about during my talk is what are the
basic hierarchy of needs that you need as a check box to knowing
that am I making the right decisions? Am I in the right mindset to
make the best decisions? And are my team also emulating these same
behaviors so that we're a positive force for communicating,
managing, and delivering what is good. I believe that all people are
inherently good, especially if they're not in these stressful
situations.
But in regards
to the talk itself, one of the topics that we're going to get
into is once you get past food, let's talk about what are some
regular things that we meet on a regular day to day basis within our
workplace in terms of what causes the stress and how do we manage
it? Let's go with the classic time. Time is not our ally
sometimes. We get the call from some stakeholder executive asking us
to do it in a shorter amount of time, asking us to do it with scant
resources.
And when that
happens, if the person is not I'd say easily influenced in
these situations, we get a lot of negative emotions. Fear. Oh my
gosh, am I going to lose my job? Anxiety, uncertainty. We lose the
confidence to being able to lead our teams. And no one wants a
project manager, a PM who's not confident. We're a
wolf-like culture. You want the best PM because you know they will
take you across the finish line, kick some butt and make sure
everyone's happy.
How do we
manage that? We talk about food as one. Number two is asking those
why questions. Why do you need it by the end of this week? And then
we talk about empathy. And one of the first things I would say is do
you understand it from their point of view, from a cognitive framing
standpoint? They're probably likely under stress, too. And
it's important to know how to negotiate that and how to manage
the other person's stress. Some Jedi mind tricks almost.
We're
going to talk about some of those tips in terms of how do you turn
those types of people who might be inducing stress within your teams
and creating that pressure versus yeah, it is pressure, but you know
what? I think we know where they're coming from and I think we
know how to solve it. We'll work together, but this is not
something we should be worried about. I would call, unless
we're building bridges or making medicine to cure people or
building space shuttles, those are life and death stresses.
If you're
building a marketing program or delivering some software, is that
really something that you should be stressing over? Everyone's
different. But one of the things is how do you ask the right
questions and how do you do it within the meeting to turn even the,
I guess, roughest of stakeholders on your side? Because I think if
we're all on the same side in these situations, it makes things
a lot easier. Here is another example of what happens, if you
don't do this, bad things will happen.
We might lose
the account. Well, will we really lose the account? I mean, really?
Why? There's no such thing as a stable job and there's no
such thing as a stable project at times, too, because anything can
happen. But if we learn to accept that level of uncertainty and not
let it be a mental drain for us, it gives us the ability to manage
the stress so you can say, "This is our priority. This is what
I think we need to do because I've taken some of these things
to consideration. What do you all think about it?"
And it's
great. I will never condemn anyone for trying their best in the
right mindset. And if they fail, that happens. Failure is not really
a true failure. It's just something we learn from. And as a PM,
we are the ones responsible for that and we need to make sure we
embrace it. I recently had a bad meeting with an executive
stakeholder and the executive called me up afterwards and said he
felt bad for being tough. And I said, "No, it was great.
Feedback is a blessing."
And what
people might see as stress, I see that as opportunity. Because
whether you love it or hate it, be one of those because the opposite
of love is indifference. And if you don't care, then we learn
nothing from it. So stress is something that we can turn to as an
ally for knowing what we need to do. But some of that is just
mentally reprogramming ourselves and seeing it for the right way.
Brett
Harned: Or reprogramming
your natural instinct to kind of react to negative...
Yoon
Chung: Yeah. I get into
situations where... You send an email to somebody asking for a
response and they just say no, N-O. I think a lot of people are
like, "How do I interpret that? They must be really angry?
Maybe they're pissed off at me." You find out they were
dealing with their kids at a soccer game and they all had enough
time just to write no right before the kids had a meltdown. We are
our own worst enemy. And as Chamine in his book Positive
Intelligence says, sometimes we're our own worst enemy. And we
can't afford to be as PM's because we are central for
executional and strategic leadership within our teams. We're
the rock of the team and I believe in it.
Brett Harned:
And in that role, you also
are kind of the person who's making sure that things are
smooth, right? Like there aren't any major waves. People are
not stressed, which also can be really hard because that stress
doesn't just manifest itself through angry conversations or a
flag going up. You can't always tell when it's there. But
I'm wondering if you've come across any ways to kind of
like monitor the team or gauge the team on stress to make sure that
you're doing everything you can to avoid the situation when
stress kind of bubbles up to the top with a team, especially when it
comes to a point where you're trying to make progress or
you're under pressure to make progress.
Yoon Chung:
I'm a big advocate
for embracing video chat. It's important to see a person's
face. And in Korean culture, there's a term called noonchi,
which translates to almost like what American would say is emotional
intelligence or being able to read another person's body
language and infer what they might be feeling. And it's
important to really look for those nonverbal cues, one. And then
secondly, my team, I try to make sure that we are syncing on a
regular basis. And I say video on, everyone.let's see those
lovely faces so I can make fun of you all. Because humor is
important.
You'll
want to see it in the face. And then you're going to want to
ask and see how are they doing with their projects in an open-ended
way. Because if you start to hear these words that you're not
familiar with, or if something is just starting to spin, it's
important to ask in just a one-on-one setting versus group. You
almost don't want to say, do you need help? Because I think PMs
we inherently don't want to ask for help because we want to do
it ourselves. People look towards us versus walk me through what
you've got going on and give advice, give some guidance in
terms of, have you thought about this? It can help you with that.
You don't
want help. I'll just do it for you. Stop arguing. But one of
the things from an agile methodology standpoint, which I'm a
huge fan of, is just the daily standup. And it might seem like a
huge bore, but in the world of video, virtual and remote, having the
connectivity and seeing the face every day is really important. Do a
daily standup, folks. See your faces. Do it for 50 minutes.
Sometimes
it's not even about calling the work up, but just seeing the
people and building that connection on a regular basis. And it will
help you avoid those situations where you get blindsided, somebody
quits, somebody has a meltdown. Because maybe you don't catch
it, but maybe your teammates do. And then they relay it saying,
"I think so and so is going to lose it, Yoon. I am just letting
you know. I mean, I care for the person. Can you help?" Start
with the daily, if you need to.
Try it out for
a couple of weeks. And if you're doing this properly, people
are going to want to come because it's fun. We just did a...
We'll ask people to dress up. Usually it's at the expense
of somebody with a meme or a joke or an animated gif that just makes
people laugh. So see everyone and talk to each other every day at
some type of team daily standup is all I would say.
Brett
Harned: Yeah. Having that
kind of personal connection with the people that you work with can
be really invaluable when it comes to stressful situations. Even
just like a regular day, it's good to know that you like the
people you work with and you know a little bit about them. I think
it makes the work all that much more meaningful and I think it makes
the job a little bit better, too, especially on those stressful
days.
So this has
been awesome. I mean, I am so disappointed that the Digital PM
Summit is not happening in-person this year. Because I imagine you
and I would be talking a lot about this stuff in-person. But
we're going to be online, which is also cool. It means that a
lot of people can attend and come to your session, which is awesome.
I have just one last question for you.
And on the
Time Limit podcast, I ask every guest a final question that's
kind of nodding to the title of the show, which is time limit, like
I said. I'm wondering if you've got any tips that kind of
don't require a lot of time or a lot of resources, tips to kind
of help set expectations or even tips to help facilitate decision
making quickly and easily.
Yoon Chung:
I'll give two. One of them is quick.
I'll just reiterate and solidify kind of all the stuff
we've been talking about. And two is a little bit more of a
maybe hour and a half investment. So number one, there's a
movie called 12 Angry Men, the 1957 version, which is amazing in
terms of how to influence decision making group dynamics. They talk
about this a lot during MBA programs, as well as tons of articles on
this in terms of both the psychology, as well as the art of
influencing. Watch that, everyone.
And I would
say if you just watch it, you will see a lot of what is in there
happens, in a much more polite way, within your workplace. So watch
that. Because doing the right thing is hard. Doing the right thing
when it's even stressful takes courage and bravery.
There's times when you just have to be willing to just put
yourself out there. So watch that movie is part one. A short
tactical way, if I had to give everyone just one takeaway with the
Time Limit theme, eat a snack, ask why, empathize with your folks.
But it's like bandages, grip it and rip it. Always lead to
action. But eat a snack and ask why. It's so simple, but...
Brett
Harned: Quick and easy
things you can do.
Yoon Chung:
You can do it every day. It's a running joke
with my team. Did Yoon have this cup of coffee? I'd be like,
"I haven't." Literally, give me two minutes, folks.
Let me go get a cup of coffee, take a deep breath and then I'll
drink. I'm like, "All right, tell me the news. Oh,
it's not that bad. We can do this. We got this. We got this,
everyone." And that's my story. I hope everyone at least
will take it to heart in some shape or form. Because I love the
field of project management. I have a huge passion. One of my goals
in life is to go to a high school or college career fair and
somebody to say, "I want to be a project manager. Like, what?
Are you kidding me? We got to talk. I'm so happy"
Brett Harned:
It's happening. It's definitely starting to happen more
than it used to at least a few years ago. And I think that digital
has a little bit to do with it. I think we're making some moves
there, which is awesome. And there's tons of students using
TeamGantt, which is really cool to see, too, and to hear their
stories. Well, Yoon, thank you so much for taking the time to join
me today. I really do appreciate it.
I hope we get
to talk again soon about some more project management stuff.
I'm always excited to kind of pick your brain and hear what
topics you're thinking on. So I hope we talk again soon. But in
the meantime, stay safe and enjoy work. Have that cup of coffee.
Make sure you drink that coffee.
Yoon Chung:
I will. Thank you so much.
Brett Harned:
All right. Thanks, Yoon. Have a good one.
Yoon Chung:
You too.
Brett
Harned: All right. There
you have it. I just have to say, Yoon's perspective on this was
so refreshing to me. I honestly do believe that project management
is a highly strategic role. And even if it isn't, if you
aren't in that position right now, it can be. So think about
how you can put your strategic hat on. Think about that and let me
know what you're thinking. I'd love to hear thoughts.
Feel free to
email me or reach out at brett@teamgantt.com and I'll certainly
get back to you. Also, if you like what you hear on Time Limit,
check out our free project management guides, templates and classes
over at teamgantt.com under the learn button in our main navigation.
And of course, feel free to leave a positive review of Time Limit
wherever you listen to your podcasts. I'll see you on the next
episode. Thanks.